Monday 20 January 2014

unit 29 assignment 1 purpose

The purpose for this music video is to publicise the fast and furious franchise, also the purpose is to promote the artists Wiz khalifa and 2chainz. The artists would of got a big fan base off this music video because the fast and furious franchise has a big audience. Also the video came out before the 6th film so this created a buzz for the new film coming out.

Friday 17 January 2014

prisonbreak

Episode 2: Allen
inbetweeners notes Generic conventions of comedy

Funny props  
car
the car door 

Costumes
monkey costume
vest and speedos 
Neils lack of costume.

Dialogue  
 "Pussy" 
 "muff"
 "you little shit" 
 "inconsiderate arse holes" 

Narrative 
 enigma
 the car door

Representations of young men    

Costume 

Will is more of a geek so hes wearing more smart clothing like shirts or a polo on, plain jeans and normal plain shoes. but when hes in school his uniform is all smart has his tie to a normal length, he has a blazer on. Niel has more of a old man look to him.

Jay has more of a manc look he has a long parka his school uniform is all messy his uniform is creased he has a small tie his shirt is out. when hes out of school he has a jack with the collar up with dark jeans.

Simon has a normal look of a 17 year old just a plain simple look with a t shirt and jacket on,jeans and shoes. 

Niel hes costumes look like his dad still buys his clothes for him. They are all a little bit to small for him. His monkey costume is more noticeable and then his other noticeable costume is when he is naked.
 
Dialogue 

Some of the dialogue used his what young adults. for example 'pussy' 'muff' 'inconsiderate arse holes' young adults will find this funny because we use words like these when we are with are mates.
 
Actions 











Stereotypes



Geek = a geek is known for the work they do also for playing computer games.
women = a women has normally got long hair, got make up on, and wear dresses.
lads = most sports obseesion

Thursday 16 January 2014

unit 6 notes


Genre; Genre is a french word for TYPE.

Target Audience; I specific audience for a specific topic. for example age,gender.

Mode of address; How we target are audience

Oppositional Reading; This is when the audience are in complete disagreement with the product’s message or setting. what your not to think/ feel about the product. 'GTA is evil and makes you violent'

Preferred Reading; This is when audiences respond to the product the way media producers want/expect them to.

Generic Conventions; what you expect to see.


Star Trek

Comedy fans- Got a close up of Simon pegg ' its exciting'
Sci-Fi fans - Setting of spaceships
Men - sfx pf explosions, costume removal bra shown. close ups of fist fights.
Star trek fans- close up of Spock moving of hand.  
women- strong narrative of women in the film.

Main streamers and also explorers for the change.

Narrative

narrative is always linear, things happen in order.
Non lnear - is a flash back in the narrative.
enigma codes9 puzzles we need the character to slove and keep us interested)

Wednesday 15 January 2014

Pastiche = Borrowing techniques or style from previous work.
Homage = respectful reference of a previous work. 
Parody = a humorous imitation of a previous work. 
unconventional = not what the majority would expect/ enjoy
 
 
1D - Shot of artists  
Narrative  
shots of girls  

Generic conventions

What would I expect to see in a science fiction film.

New technology
Spaceships
space
special effects

Monday 13 January 2014

notes on music video

Purpose 

Synergy= two things combined to make one good thing.
 Publicise the video and artists.
 product promotion
 to get youtube hits.
 to develop a fan base.
 lyric interpretation

 De-Construct

style= a bit like genre

real life footage
shots of fans
timelapse
archive footage.
shots of the stage
conventions

 Animation;

this can be variety of flavours such as

stop motion
2d drawn
3d computer animated


Assignment 26 unit 3 (ironman)

https://drive.google.com/?tab=wo&authuser=0#my-drive

Thursday 9 January 2014

Reflecttive analyiasis

What worked?

I think what worked is that we worked as a group and we all knew what we was doing and how we wanted the documentary to be like. We all listened to each others opinions.

What could of been improved? 

I think the sound could be improved because when we filmed we had bad weather. And some of the interviews could be bitter better.

How will you improve your next production? 


what new skills did you learn? 
  
I learnt new camera skills and also new editing skills.


unit 3



Unit 3 Mark Scheme
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the research in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P2, M2 or D2
P2, There is primary and secondary research such as interviews and statistics or quotes
M2  There is primary and secondary research such as interviews and statistics or quotes that are useful and have come from well chosen places/people
D2: There is a lot of information given from interviews, statistics and quotes and is it all interesting and from relevant people, and not from just obvious places like Wikipedia.
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the sort of information in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P2, M2 or D2
P2 There Is a lot of the information on the topic but some of it irrelevant and awkwardly put in
M2 All the research and information is  focused on the topic and clearly teaches the audience about the topic
D2 The documentary draws conclusions (summaries) about the topic and the impact it is having on people/places etc
Pick one of the two options below that best describes the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it eitherP3/M3 or D3
P3/M3: The documentary is understandable but at times a bit confusing, or wanders off the topic.
D3: The documentary is  understandable and well structured, I feel as though I have learnt something
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the visual aids and or graphics used in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P3, M3 or D3
P3: There are visual aids and graphics but they are not clear/well presented and are not really showing information/research about the topic
M3: They have shown information statistics or information about the topic in visual aids and graphics that are clear and understandable.
D3: They have shown relevant information/research clearly through Visual aids or graphics in an eye catching way
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the references to research in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P3, M3 or D3
P3: The research sources are named/referenced in text and credits, but does it lack a sense of structure or miss things out like names/years etc
M3: Most of the research they have shown is credited in subtitles and credits and they look professional and well formatted
D3: They have references to all research typed in a proper format within the documentary and in a professional way in the credits.
Unit 38 Mark Scheme
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the research in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P4, M4 or D4
P4: The sound is clear, I am able to hear the interviews and non diegetic sound
M4: The sound is good, I am able to clearly hear dialogue and non diegetic sound (there might be one or two mistakes but it won’t affect your ability to watch it)
D4: The sound is creative.  It is  clear with little or no mistakes and it adds to the documentary, making it more engaging or powerful.



Christmas documentary

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ENMWzerh2Y

Wednesday 8 January 2014

unit 3 alexs bullying documentary


Unit 3 Mark Scheme
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the research in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P2, M2 or D2
P2, There is primary and secondary research such as interviews and statistics or quotes
M2  There is primary and secondary research such as interviews and statistics or quotes that are useful and have come from well chosen places/people
D2: There is a lot of information given from interviews, statistics and quotes and is it all interesting and from relevant people, and not from just obvious places like Wikipedia. I agree with this 
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the sort of information in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P2, M2 or D2
P2 There Is a lot of the information on the topic but some of it irrelevant and awkwardly put in
M2 All the research and information is  focused on the topic and clearly teaches the audience about the topic
D2 The documentary draws conclusions (summaries) about the topic and the impact it is having on people/places etc; I agree with this
Pick one of the two options below that best describes the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it eitherP3/M3 or D3
P3/M3: The documentary is understandable but at times a bit confusing, or wanders off the topic.
D3: The documentary is  understandable and well structured, I feel as though I have learnt something; I agree with this
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the visual aids and or graphics used in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P3, M3 or D3
P3: There are visual aids and graphics but they are not clear/well presented and are not really showing information/research about the topic
M3: They have shown information statistics or information about the topic in visual aids and graphics that are clear and understandable.
D3: They have shown relevant information/research clearly through Visual aids or graphics in an eye catching way; i agree with this
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the references to research in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P3, M3 or D3
P3: The research sources are named/referenced in text and credits, but does it lack a sense of structure or miss things out like names/years etc
M3: Most of the research they have shown is credited in subtitles and credits and they look professional and well formatted
D3: They have references to all research typed in a proper format within the documentary and in a professional way in the credits.; i agree with this
Unit 38 Mark Scheme
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the research in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P4, M4 or D4
P4: The sound is clear, I am able to hear the interviews and non diegetic sound
M4: The sound is good, I am able to clearly hear dialogue and non diegetic sound (there might be one or two mistakes but it won’t affect your ability to watch it)
D4: The sound is creative.  It is  clear with little or no mistakes and it adds to the documentary, making it more engaging or powerful.; i agree with this
 



unit 3 bullying marked



Unit 3 Mark Scheme katies bullying
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the research in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P2, M2 or D2
P2, There is primary and secondary research such as interviews and statistics or quotes;
M2  There is primary and secondary research such as interviews and statistics or quotes that are useful and have come from well chosen places/people;
i agree with this, but i think they could of worked harder could of done more research.
D2: There is a lot of information given from interviews, statistics and quotes and is it all interesting and from relevant people, and not from just obvious places like Wikipedia.
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the sort of information in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P2, M2 or D2
P2 There Is a lot of the information on the topic but some of it irrelevant and awkwardly put in; they havent got anyone in the documentary who has actually been bullied or got any teachers opinions.
M2 All the research and information is  focused on the topic and clearly teaches the audience about the topic
D2 The documentary draws conclusions (summaries) about the topic and the impact it is having on people/places etc
Pick one of the two options below that best describes the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it eitherP3/M3 or D3
P3/M3: The documentary is understandable but at times a bit confusing, or wanders off the topic.
D3: The documentary is  understandable and well structured, I feel as though I have learnt something i agree with this
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the visual aids and or graphics used in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P3, M3 or D3
P3: There are visual aids and graphics but they are not clear/well presented and are not really showing information/research about the topic; I agree with this they could of
M3: They have shown information statistics or information about the topic in visual aids and graphics that are clear and understandable. ; I agree with this
D3: They have shown relevant information/research clearly through Visual aids or graphics in an eye catching way
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the references to research in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P3, M3 or D3
P3: The research sources are named/referenced in text and credits, but does it lack a sense of structure or miss things out like names/years etc; I agree with this
M3: Most of the research they have shown is credited in subtitles and credits and they look professional and well formatted
D3: They have references to all research typed in a proper format within the documentary and in a professional way in the credits.
Unit 38 Mark Scheme
Pick one of the three options below that best describes the research in the documentary. Explain in the box why you have given it either P4, M4 or D4
P4: The sound is clear, I am able to hear the interviews and non diegetic sound; I agree with this
M4: The sound is good, I am able to clearly hear dialogue and non diegetic sound (there might be one or two mistakes but it won’t affect your ability to watch it)
D4: The sound is creative.  It is  clear with little or no mistakes and it adds to the documentary, making it more engaging or powerful.